Abstracts for presentations at the 97th AAP Annual Meeting in Miami Beach...

2011 Research Forum Poster Session Abstracts

Abstracts for finalists in the Research Forum Poster competition during the 97th AAP Annual Meeting in Miami Beach.

The Research Forum provides a platform for clinical and basic research to be presented by those in the field of periodontics. The poster finalists below were on display in the Annual Meeting Exhibit Hall, and the following researchers won cash prizes:

Abstracts can also be accessed using the AAP's Abstract Viewer.

BASIC RESEARCH ABSTRACTS

Effect of DMP1 on Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells


Photo

Photo







Differential Expression of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts in Diabetic Conditions: An in Vitro Investigation

Freeze-Dried Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)-Coated Polyglactin Mesh: A Promising Alternative for Wound Care and Periodontal Regenerative Therapy














Immunohistoflourescence and MRNA Expression of Bone Markers during Early Healing around Dental Implants. A Novel Approach in Miniature Pigs.





Figure 1. Gene expression was measured for Osterix (green), Osteopontin (purple), and Osteocalcin (blue) at 2 weeks – mean values and standard error. Gapdh was used for endogenous control. SLActive demonstrated lowest level of Osterix, but highest level of Osteopontin & Osteocalcin. However, due to small sample number and large difference between two animals, no statistical significance level of gene expression was found between SLActive, SLA, and Roxolid.


Figure 2. Representative immunohistoflourescence views at 3 days. (left) DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) + Cy5 (Cyanine 5); DAPI’s blue emission illustrates DNA and outlines the chamber. (middle) Cy5; red emission illustrates Osteocalcin antigen reactivity, which outlines native bone and not detected inside the chamber. (right) Negative control shows there was no background staining.


Figure 3. Representative immunohistoflourescence views of Roxolid implant at 2 weeks. (left) DAPI + Cy5; combination of blue (DAPI) and red (Cy5) clearly demarcate the bone chamber. (middle) Cy5; a pronounced Osteocalcin antigen reactivity (red) was observed inside the bone chamber. (right) Negative control.


Figure 4. Quantification of Osteocalcin expression inside the bone chambers detected by immunohistoflourescence at 2 weeks - Osteocalcin / total area [%], mean value and standard error. There was no statistical difference between SLActive, SLA, and Roxolid.

Small Interfering RNA-Mediated Silencing of Toll-like Receptors 2 and 4 Modify Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 Production by Human Gingival and Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts



Effect of TLR4 silencing in HGF and HPLF as assessed by mRNA analyses of TLR4. The mRNA levels were assessed by quantitative real-time PCR with TaqMan assays and normalized against RPL13A (reference gene). Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 8.5 x 103cells/well in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). After overnight attachment, fibroblasts were transfected with a scrambled siRNA or TLR4 siRNA. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the media were changed and DMEM with 10% FBS was added with or without the addition of P. gingivalis LPS (1µg/mL), E. coli LPS (1µg/mL), Pam2CSK4 (TLR2/6 agonist, 50 ng/mL), or Pam3CSK4 (TLR2/1 agonist, 500 ng/mL). The values represent mean ± SEM from 4 wells/group. Asterisk denote statistical difference compared with SCR siRNA (*p < 0.01).


Effect of TLR2 and TLR4 silencing in IL-6 production by HGF. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 8.5 x 103cells/well in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). After overnight attachment, fibroblasts were transfected with a scrambled siRNA, TLR2 or TLR4 siRNA. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the media were changed and DMEM with 10% FBS was added with or without the addition of P. gingivalis LPS (1µg/mL), E. coli LPS (1µg/mL), Pam2CSK4 (TLR2/6 agonist, 50 ng/mL), or Pam3CSK4 (TLR2/1 agonist, 500 ng/mL). The values represent mean ± SEM from 4 wells/group. Asterisk denote statistical difference compared with SCR siRNA (*p < 0.001).


Effect of TLR2 and TLR4 silencing in IL-6 production by HPLF. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 8.5 x 103cells/well in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). After overnight attachment, fibroblasts were transfected with a scrambled siRNA, TLR2 or TLR4 siRNA. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the media were changed and DMEM with 10% FBS was added with or without the addition of P. gingivalis LPS (1µg/mL), E. coli LPS (1µg/mL), Pam2CSK4 (TLR2/6 agonist, 50 ng/mL), or Pam3CSK4 (TLR2/1 agonist, 500 ng/mL). The values represent mean ± SEM from 4 wells/group. Asterisk denote statistical difference compared with SCR siRNA (*p < 0.001).


Effect of TLR2 and TLR4 silencing in IL-8 production by HGF. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 8.5 x 103cells/well in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). After overnight attachment, fibroblasts were transfected with a scrambled siRNA, TLR2 or TLR4 siRNA. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the media were changed and DMEM with 10% FBS was added with or without the addition of P. gingivalis LPS (1µg/mL), E. coli LPS (1µg/mL), Pam2CSK4 (TLR2/6 agonist, 50 ng/mL), or Pam3CSK4 (TLR2/1 agonist, 500 ng/mL). The values represent mean ± SEM from 4 wells/group. Asterisk denote statistical difference compared with SCR siRNA (*p < 0.001).


Effect of TLR2 and TLR4 silencing in IL-8 production by HPLF. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 8.5 x 103cells/well in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). After overnight attachment, fibroblasts were transfected with a scrambled siRNA, TLR2 or TLR4 siRNA. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the media were changed and DMEM with 10% FBS was added with or without the addition of P. gingivalis LPS (1µg/mL), E. coli LPS (1µg/mL), Pam2CSK4 (TLR2/6 agonist, 50 ng/mL), or Pam3CSK4 (TLR2/1 agonist, 500 ng/mL). The values represent mean ± SEM from 4 wells/group. Asterisk denote statistical difference compared with SCR siRNA (*p < 0.01).

Localization of Porphyromonas Gingivalis and Tannerella Forsythia in Gingival and Subgingival Granulation Tissues Using Novel Monoclonal Antibodies


Potential of a Novel PDGF-BB / VEGF-A PLGA Microspheres Scaffold for Hard Tissue Regeneration



Fig. 1 - Calvarial injections region of interest (yellow box on the right Parietal bone). Image correspond to μCT of a positive control sample (injected with rhBMP-2). Red lines correspond to the areas of the histological sections.


Fig. 2 – Histological sections of Parietal bones on the region of interest - Fluorescence Microscopy of Control Groups. Top: rhBMP-2 (Positive Control); Bottom: Saline (Negative Control)


Fig. 3 - Histological sections of Parietal bones on the region of interest - Fluorescence microscopy of test groups. Top: rhPDGF-BB; Bottom: rhVEGF-A165.


Fig. 4 - Micro-CT of mice calvariae - Calvarial injections over critical size defects. Left: Saline injections (control); Right: rhPDGF-BB.


Fig. 5 – New bone formation and mineralized bone graft particles on the calvarial defect experiment groups with bone grafts and growth factors injections. Bars represent mean area (in mm3) of mineralized tissue measured by μCT.


Fig. 6 – Change in bone volume above the calvaria induced by scaffolds with growth factors or saline. Bars represent mean amount of fold change in each group.

Effect of Systemic Parathyroid Hormone (1-34), Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2, and Demineralized Bone Matrix on Local Bone Formation in the Rat Critical-Size Calvarial Defect Model



Surgery


4 Weeks


8 Weeks


4 Weeks, + PTH


8 Weeks, + PTH


Histometric Defect Closure

CLINICAL RESEARCH ABSTRACTS

The Effects of a Static Magnet Field on the Osseointegration Process Following Immediate Implant Placement into Fresh Extraction Sockets: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Clinical Evaluation of Guided Bone Regeneration in Horizontally Challenged Edentulous Ridges during Implant Placement Surgery



Control group
a) Baseline defect after flap reflection (buccal view)
b) Baseline defect after flap reflection (occlusal view)
c) Implant placement (buccal view)
d) Implant placement (occlusal view)
e) Placement of mineralized human cancellous allograft on the buccal implant dehiscence defect (buccal view)
f) Placement of mineralized human cortical allograft (buccal view)
g) Placement of mineralized human cortical allograft (occlusal view)


Test group
a) Baseline defect (buccal view)
b) Baseline defect (occlusal view)
c) Baseline defect after flap reflection (buccal view)
d) Baseline defect after flap reflection (occlusal view)
e) Implant placement (buccal view)
f) Implant placement (occlusal view)


Test group
g) Placement of mineralized human cancellous allograft on the buccal implant dehiscence defect (buccal view)
h) Placement of mineralized human cancellous allograft on the buccal implant dehiscence defect (occlusal view)
i) Placement of mineralized human cortical allograft (buccal view)
j) Placement of mineralized human cortical allograft (occlusal view)
k) Placement of pericardium membrane over the bone allografts (buccal view)
l) Placement of pericardium membrane over the bone allografts (occlusal view)


a) Clinical re-entry at control site 6 months post implant placement (buccal view)
b) Clinical re-entry at control site 6 months post implant placement (occlusal view)
c) Clinical re-entry at test site 6 months post implant placement (buccal view)
d) Clinical re-entry at test site 6 months post implant placement (occlusal view)
e) Histological view showing bone formation around bone allograft particles at 6 months
f) Magnified histological view


CBCT analysis
Bone width at control site at
a) Baseline
b) Implant placement
c) 6 months post surgery
Bone width at test site at
d) Baseline
e) Implant placement
f) 6 months post surgery


Radiographic assessment
Vertical bone level at control site at
a) Baseline
b) Implant placement
c) 6 months post implant placement
d) 12 months post implant placement
Vertical bone level at test site at
e) Baseline
f) Implant placement
g) 6 months post implant placement
h) 12 months post implant placement

Interleukin-6 Gene Promoter Methylation in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Periodontitis

Validation of Self-Reported Measures for Periodontitis –Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Disease Duration of 50 Years or Longer

Polymorphisms in Pattern Recognition Receptors in Periodontitis

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Labial Salivary Glands in Xerostomic Patients



Figure 1: The percentage of TUNEL positive cells (apoptosis) between subject groups. Subject groups were statistically non-significantly different (P>0.20).


Figure 2: The percentage of Ki-67 positive cells (proliferation) between subject groups. Subject groups were statistically non-significantly different (P>0.60).


Figure 3: The percentage of PCNA positive cells (proliferation and DNA repair) between subject groups. Subject groups were statistically significantly different (P<0.001).

Tissue Engineered Cultured Periosteal Sheet Application to Periodontal Regeneration: Three Year Results



Figure 1. Representative clinical case of a site surgically treated with hCP sheets in combination with a PRP and HA granule mixture

A) Pretreatment view of mandibular right lateral incisor with clinical attachment Level (CAL) of 8 mm and probing depth (PD) of 8 mm on the mesial aspect.
B) Reflection of a surgical flap and debridement of the area revealed the two- and three-walled osseous defect.
C) Grafting with the PRP + HA granules into the intrabony osseous defect.
D) Intraoperative facial view of the surgical site following placement of the hCP sheet covering the PRP + HA granules.


Figure 2. Clinical results at 1, 2 and 3 years of a site surgically treated with hCP sheets in combination with a PRP and HA granule mixture.

1Y) 1 year post-treatment view of the surgical site with CAL of 5 mm and PD of 2 mm.
2Y) 2 years post-treatment view of the surgical site with CAL of 5 mm and PD of 2 mm.
3Y) 3 years post-treatment view of the surgical site with CAL of 5 mm and PD of 3 mm.


Figure 3. Radiographic results at baseline, one, two and three years, of a site surgically treated with hCP sheets in combination with a PRP and HA granule mixture.

Baseline) Pretreatment standardized radiograph suggests an intrabony defect on the mesial surface of the mandibular right lateral incisor.
1Y) Radiopaque fill of the mesial osseous defect at 1 year post-surgery.
2Y) Radiopaque fill of the mesial osseous defect at 2 years post-surgery.
3Y) Radiopaque fill of the mesial osseous defect at 3 years post-surgery.


Figure 4. Change in mean (±SD) clinical and radiographic measurements from baseline to the 1- and 3-year time periods (n=22, p <0.01).


Figure 5. In vitro observation of the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and mineralization of hCP sheets.

ALP activity: ALP activity of a hCP sheet cultured in growth medium for 35 days.
Mineral deposits: Dark-brown areas represent von Kossa-positive mineral deposits. The hCP sheet was cultured in growth medium for 60 days.


Figure 6. Surface markers associated with the hCP sheet.

The hCP sheets were positive for CD73, CD90 and CD105 antigens, whereas negative for CD19, CD34, and CD45 antigens.

The Influence of Biofilm in Gingival Overgrowth in Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Tacrolimus or Ciclosporin-A. A 12 Months Prospective Study.






Browse More Research Forum Abstracts

Clinical/Scientific Resources

What's New


AAP Spring Conference in Chicago